The Padded Cell

I always find it amusing when biblical apologists try to explain what was really meant by a particular story of the "bible". If god was so all-powerful and all-knowing, wouldn't he had written his book so all could understand it, as is, for all eternity, instead of leaving things open to interpretation?

Here's an example. The test of Abraham. Here, god tells Abraham to prove his faith by killing his first born son. But when Abe finally is ready to actually do it, after agonizing for who knows how long, god stops him at the last second.

To the apologist, this is god's way of testing his subjects to make sure they're really faithful (so much for being all-knowing). In a modern context, this is called psychological terror. We arrest people and put them away for doing stuff like that.

The apologist says that such tests were a normal part of life during that time. So that somehow makes it right. There are reasons we don't do those things any more.

Revenant